The Little Sisters of the Poor are going back to the Supreme Court for the 3rd time, forced to defend themselves against the contraceptive mandate in the ACA Any nonprofit or for-profit employer, including publicly traded companies, could now be exempted on religious grounds, and employers and schools with “moral” but not religious objections to birth control could also claim exemptions. As Kagan wrote, the administration may not have used “reasoned decisionmaking,” and lower courts should attempt to resolve the issue in the next round. Join Slate Plus to continue reading, and you’ll get unlimited access to all our work—and support Slate’s independent journalism. Sister Loraine Marie Maguire is a mother provincial of the Little Sisters of the Poor in the United States. In a 7-2 decision in Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania , the Court ended the long legal struggle the nuns, who care for the elderly poor … After nearly 10 years of litigation, the Little Sisters of the Poor finally won in the Supreme Court on Wednesday — again. Echoing her own fears expressed at oral arguments that the court seems to have written women’s health and equality interests out of the equation altogether, she wrote, “This Court leaves women workers to fend for themselves, to seek contraceptive coverage from sources other than their employer’s insurer, and, absent another available source of funding, to pay for contraceptive services out of their own pockets.”. Thanks to the persistence of a group of nuns, the Supreme Court on Wednesday looks to have resolved the controversy once and for all. And you'll never see this message again. Abortion advocates have spent years trying to force the Catholic nuns to fund the destruction of unborn babies in abortions. The Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home . Whenever we talk about women’s reproductive freedom in America being stripped away by a thousand tiny cuts, we aren’t just referencing whether clinics in Louisiana may survive until the next regulation is enacted. The government estimated at oral arguments that broadening the religious exemption would result in as many as 125,000 women losing their statutorily mandated contraceptive coverage. The case is the latest in an odyssey of litigation around religious dissenters and employer-covered contraception. little sisters of the poor saints peter and paul home, petitioner 19–431 . 19–431 and 19–454 . In a 7-2 decision in Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania , the Court ended the long legal struggle the nuns, who care for the elderly poor … Today, the U.S. Supreme Court has vindicated the foundational freedom of our country and the Constitution: the right of religious liberty. Docket no. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday the Little Sisters of the Poor Catholic religious order is exempt from Obamacare’s contraceptive mandate. by CMF | Jul 17, 2020 | Media Appearances, Press Releases | 0 comments, For Immediate ReleaseWashington, DC (July 17, 2020). You can cancel anytime. ALITO, J., filed a con- curring opinion, in which GORSUCH, J., joined. But the court is overseeing a seismic and lasting shift away from factoring women’s health into the picture. 1:13–cv–02611 (D Colo.), p. 5 (Complaint). In 2016, the Supreme Court remanded the … While the Christ Medicus Foundation (CMF) applauds this Supreme Court decision, we encourage Americans to remain vigilant in defending religious freedom. In a 7-2 decision, and after nearly a decade of litigation through all levels of the federal judiciary, the U.S. Supreme Court today—once and for all—upheld the right of the Little Sisters of the Poor to follow their religious convictions. After years of litigation, the Little Sisters won their case at the U.S. Supreme Court in May 2016. By Calvin Freiburger WASHINGTON, D.C., July 8, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – The US Supreme Court ruled 7-2 Wednesday in a decision siding with the Little Sisters of … We must stay focused on defending the rights of conscience and religious freedom in health care which are foundational to civil rights in our country.”, Jordan Buzza, Director of the pro-life Catholic health care ministry, CMF CURO, affirms, “This decision is a victory for religious freedom. Justices Elena Kagan and Stephen Breyer joined in the narrow decision to send the case back to the lower courts for review, on the theory that, yes, the government has the authority to promulgate exemptions. 4 LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SAINTS PETER AND PAUL HOMEv. That case was heard by the court in May. It bears mentioning that this decision comes down in the midst of a pandemic alongside crippling national job losses and financial hardship. Both the government and Little Sisters petitioned the Supreme Court on the Third Circuit decision. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, the high court made the unusual and unprecedented move of hearing the consolidated cases of Little Sisters … Last week I worried about how even the decision in June Medical, ostensibly a pro-woman ruling, seemed to have erased women’s reproductive challenges from the holding in the case. Troy, MI 48084, Phone: (800) 840-7471 The Department of Justice, and the Catholic nonprofit Little Sisters of the Poor, asked the Supreme Court to reverse those rulings. In a 7-2 decision, the high court in Little Sisters of the Poor v. The Department of Justice, and the Catholic nonprofit Little Sisters … Of cardinal significance, the exemption contains no alternative mechanism to ensure affected women’s continued access to contraceptive coverage.” Without insurance, women can expect to pay $600 to $1,000 annually for oral contraception and more for IUDs. Their original case was finally resolved at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in … Justice Thomas’ thoughtfully restrained opinion resolves questions about the rule-making authority of HHS under the Affordable Care Act, without directly considering the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, but it is a clear victory for the Little Sisters. Thanks to the persistence of a group of nuns, the Supreme Court on Wednesday looks to have resolved the controversy once and for all. Little Sisters Of The Poor Home For The Aged, Denver, Colorado, A Colorado Non-profit Corporation, et al., Applicants: v. Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. “The only question we face today is what the plain language of the statute authorizes,” Thomas wrote. Your email address will not be published. As religious dissenters continue to swallow the protections, rights, and entitlements afforded to women under the law, the trend lines are clear. The lawsuit effectively flipped the theme of litigation in these cases from “Can religious dissenters opt out of the contraception mandate?” to “Can the Trump administration allow anyone to opt out so long as they claim a religious or ‘moral’ objection to contraception?”, In his majority opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas determined that the Trump administration “had the authority to provide exemptions from the regulatory contraceptive requirements for employers with religious and conscientious objections.” Pennsylvania had also argued that the administration rolled out the rule without sufficient process, but Thomas rejected that idea, dissolving the nationwide injunction and remanding the case back to the lower courts. For more of Slate’s legal coverage, listen to Amicus below, or subscribe to the show on Apple Podcasts, Overcast, Spotify, Stitcher, Google Play, or wherever you get your podcasts. In a 7–2 decision on Wednesday, the Supreme Court upheld a Trump administration rule that greatly broadens a religious exemption to the contraception mandate of the Affordable Care Act. Poor women and women of color will be hardest hit, yet again. The same seems to be true of the women who do not share the religious views of their schools or employers, whose interests have been sidelined in this ostensible balancing test. v. pennsylvania, et al. In short, the Supreme Court has given us back our freedom to serve. And we can’t wait to do it. WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously protected the Little Sisters of the Poor from draconian government fines and recognized that the government does not need the Little Sisters to provide services such as the week after pill. Under Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania, an employer with a “sincerely held religious or moral objection” to providing this coverage may now decline to cover their employees’ contraception. on writs of certiorari to the united states court … v. pennsylvania, et al. Suite 150 For Immediate Release Washington, DC (July 17, 2020) After nearly seven years of litigation, the Little Sisters of the Poor have again won at the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania. By joining Slate Plus you support our work and get exclusive content. The Supreme Court on Wednesday voted 7–2 to allow employers with sincerely held moral or religious objections an exemption from an Obama-era mandate to provide contraception in their health-care plans.The decision upholds President Trump’s 2017 executive order exempting the Little Sisters of the Poor, a Catholic order of nuns that runs homes for the elderly poor, and other religious … The Little Sisters of the Poor found themselves back before the Supreme Court, intervening to protect the new rules and the religious accommodations they received under them. The Little Sisters have been on the front-lines of the Coronavirus care, and have lost a number of residents in their Newark, Delaware home. The Little Sisters of the Poor, a Catholic charitable organization serving impoverished elderly people, fought back in court. Women, already bearing the brunt of shutdowns and child care, may now lose access to vital contraception, Columbus’ Policing Problem Goes Deeper Than the Shooting of Andre Hill, Amy Coney Barrett Is Already Putting Her Mark on the Supreme Court, Justice Breyer on Whether Judges Get More Liberal as They Get Older, The First Woman to Face Federal Execution in 67 Years Never Got to Tell Her Story. The case, Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania, marked the Catholic religious order’s second time before the Supreme Court, after nearly 10 years of legal dispute. Slate relies on advertising to support our journalism. Alito (joined by Gorsuch) wrote that he would have gone much further, arguing that the prior administration’s refusal to broaden the accommodation to sincere religious objectors violated the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. It’s useful to recall that what the court taketh away cannot be fixed in the next legislative session or the one that follows. The Supreme Court on Wednesday issued two important decisions affirming the right of religious groups to manage the internal affairs of their institutions free from government interference. Consistent with their Catholic faith, the Little Sisters hold the religious conviction “that deliberately avoiding reproduction through medical means is immoral.” Then she drew a reasoned decision-making map for future litigation: “The agency does so when it has not given ‘a satisfactory explanation for its action’—when it has failed to draw a ‘rational connection’ between the problem it has identified and the solution it has chosen, or when its thought process reveals ‘a clear error of judgment.’ ”, Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor dissented, with Ginsburg writing, as she did in Hobby Lobby, to point out that in what should be a careful accommodating of two competing interests (religion and health), the balance was again being skewed dramatically away from women’s health. Email: info@christmedicus.org. If you value our work, please disable your ad blocker. donald j. trump, president of the united states, et al., petitioners 19–454 . After nearly seven years of litigation, the Little Sisters of the Poor have again won at the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania. Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania. A huge 7-2 win for The Little Sisters of the Poor as the Supreme Court upholds the Trump Admin’s religious & moral exemptions from Obamacare’s … The Little Sisters of the Poor found themselves back before the Supreme Court, intervening to protect the new rules and the religious accommodations they received under them. The Trump administration and the Little Sisters of the Poor, a Roman Catholic religious order for women, are asking the Supreme Court to reverse the lower court. You’ve run out of free articles. When the ACA was passed in 2010, employers had to provide cost-free contraceptive coverage as part of preventive health care. supreme court of the united states . In 2017, the Trump administration broadened the category of religious exemptions to include yet more employers who wanted to be free from the obligation to cover their workers’ contraception. A follow-on rule gave religious nonprofits an accommodation that allowed them to opt out of providing contraceptive coverage if they “self-certified,” or gave written notice of, their religious objection, at which point their insurer or the government would pay for the coverage. Slate is published by The Slate Group, a Graham Holdings Company. In 2016, the Supreme Court remanded the case back to the lower courts. The Supreme Court issued a ruling today upholding a pro-life order from President Donald Trump that protected the Little Sisters of the Poor from being force to pay for abortion-causing drugs under their health insurance plan. WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Little Sisters of the Poor 7-2 today, allowing them to continue serving the elderly poor and dying without threat of millions of dollars in fines. In one case, the court held that the Little Sisters of the Poor should not be required to cooperate in providing contraceptive coverage to employees. The Supreme Court issued a ruling today upholding a pro-life order from President Donald Trump that protected the Little Sisters of the Poor from being force to pay for abortion-causing drugs under their health insurance plan. More litigation followed, as even the self-certification requirement was deemed to be triggering abortions. We have more work to do. All rights reserved. Women, already bearing the brunt of shutdowns and child care, may now lose access to vital contraception coverage. We are talking about a web of decisions that demote women to bystanders. New Jersey joined Pennsylvania in the suit. “And the plain language of the statute clearly allows the Departments to create the preventive care standards as well as the religious and moral exemptions.”, Thomas was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Associate Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh. With these religious objector cases, we are witnessing the blurring of women’s constitutional and statutory rights into the background as the interests of everyone else, including their religious bosses, are positioned as singular and urgent. 2150 Butterfield Drive All contents © 2020 The Slate Group LLC. The Department of Justice, and the Catholic nonprofit Little Sisters of the Poor, asked the Supreme Court to reverse those rulings. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday the Little Sisters of the Poor Catholic religious order is exempt from Obamacare’s contraceptive mandate. Abortion advocates have spent years trying to force the Catholic nuns to fund the destruction of unborn babies in abortions. Unfortunately, the continued possibility that a future presidential administration could undo religious freedom protections in health care plans reminds us that we must be ever vigilant. PENNSYLVANIA Syllabus THOMAS, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS, C. J., and ALITO, GORSUCH, and KAVANAUGH, JJ., joined. But they seemed uncertain the new exemptions would survive lower court scrutiny. New Jersey joined Pennsylvania in the suit. This latest decision upholds the religious exemption crafted by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) that protects the Little Sisters from being forced to provide contraception and abortion in their health plan, and it should be celebrated by all who cherish religious freedom and all other civil rights. Complaint ¶14 in Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged, Denver, Colo. v. Sebelius, No. A federal appeals court in Philadelphia enjoined those new rules nationwide. Little Sisters of the Poor on Supreme Court win: God has protected us July 9, 2020, 4:38 AM Sister Constance Veit and the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty's Montse Alvarado join 'Fox & Friends' after the Supreme Court upholds religious and moral exemptions for birth control coverage. Now they’re fighting to preserve that earlier victory. The Supreme Court certified the cases in January 2020, consolidating both the Little Sisters and government petition. As the dissent notes, the animating idea behind religious accommodations is that the government may surely accommodate religion but it may not benefit religious adherents at the expense of the rights of “third parties.” The third parties here are the women who have simply fallen out of the majority’s calculations. Readers like you make our work possible. Louis Brown, the Executive Director of the Christ Medicus Foundation, explains, “The contraceptive mandate which forced the Little Sisters of the Poor to violate their conscience was extremely unjust and did not advance authentic health care.” He continues, highlighting the importance of this paramount win, “The Little Sisters should be celebrated by our culture for their heroic work in service to the elderly poor, not forced to litigate for years on end to defend their inalienable rights to religious freedom and conscience. But the Obama administration created a narrow carve-out that allowed houses of worship to opt out of the contraception mandate. Help us continue to provide the reporting, commentary, and criticism you won’t find anywhere else. Yes, the next administration could change the opt-out rules again. “Today, for the first time, the Court casts totally aside countervailing rights and interests in its zeal to secure religious rights to the nth degree.”, Ginsburg pointed out the government has estimated between 70,500 and 126,400 women would lose their “no-cost contraceptive services” if more employers were exempt from providing it. Their defense has faced numerous highs and lows, from the false accommodation offered under the Obama Administration, to their previous victory at the Supreme Court.” He concludes saying, “It is the hope of the Christ Medicus Foundation that the litigation surrounding the Little Sisters can finally end so they can continue undisturbed in their important work of caring for the elderly poor.”, Your email address will not be published. In a 7-2 decision, the high court in Little Sisters of the Poor v. A federal appeals court in Philadelphia enjoined those new rules nationwide. The Little Sisters of the Poor found themselves back before the Supreme Court, intervening to protect the new rules and the religious accommodations they received under them. If you thought the Little Sisters of the Poor already won big at the Supreme Court, you’d be right. Respondent Commonweath of Pennsylvania and State of New Jersey . The Little Sisters, who number more than 2,000 among dozens of U.S. convents, first challenged the Obamacare mandate before the Supreme Court in 2016. This was one of two big wins today for religious employers seeking to end-run laws intended to protect workers. After nearly 10 years of litigation, the Little Sisters of the Poor finally won in the Supreme Court on Wednesday — again. Today, they experience Round 2 at the U.S. Supreme Court in a case that should be renamed Insatiable Ideologues v. Little Sisters of the Poor. Required fields are marked *, Christ Medicus Foundation Today, the U.S. Supreme Court has vindicated the foundational freedom of our country and the Constitution: the right of religious liberty. A right to worship — responsibly | Pittsburgh Gazette publishes OpEd by CMF CURO Director, Jordan Buzza, Christ Medicus Foundation statement on Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo – EWTN News Nightly, Christ Medicus Foundation calls for an end to restrictions on houses of worship in the wake of Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo, Michael Vacca Discusses Religious Liberty During COVID-19 on Bioethics on Air, MyCatholicDoctor Appoints Louis Brown to Board of Directors. The Little Sisters, who number more than 2,000 among dozens of U.S. convents, first challenged the Obamacare mandate before the Supreme Court in 2016. A future government takeover of healthcare would reverse these protections and would be devastating for the pro-life movement. nos. We are thankful to the Supreme Court and Justice Thomas for this decision.”, Michael Vacca, Director of Ministry, Bioethics, and Member Experience for CMF CURO explains: “The Little Sisters have faced a consistent assault on their religious freedom since the inception of the contraceptive mandate. “Accommodating claims of religious freedom, this Court has taken a balanced approach, one that does not allow the religious beliefs of some to overwhelm the rights and interests of others who do not share those beliefs,” she wrote. Washington, DC (July 17, 2020) After nearly seven years of litigation, the Little Sisters of the Poor have again won at the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Little Sisters of the … In a 7-2 decision, and after nearly a decade of litigation through all levels of the federal judiciary, the U.S. Supreme Court today—once and for all—upheld the right of the Little Sisters of the Poor to follow their religious convictions. As Ginsburg writes, “More than 2.9 million Americans—including approximately 580,000 women of childbearing age—receive insurance through organizations newly eligible for this blanket exemption. After seven years of unending legal conflict to save their ministry, the Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the Little Sisters of the Poor 7-2, allowing them to continue serving the elderly poor and dying without threat of millions of dollars in fines. Group, a Catholic charitable organization serving impoverished elderly people, fought back in Court Sisters petitioned Supreme. Latest in an odyssey of litigation, the Supreme Court has vindicated foundational... Short, the Supreme Court to reverse those rulings brunt of shutdowns and child care, now... And we can ’ t find anywhere else administration could change the opt-out rules again Poor, the! Women to bystanders a mother provincial of the Poor in the Supreme Court on —. Fighting to preserve that earlier victory “ the only question we face today is what the plain language of Poor! ), p. 5 ( Complaint ) cost-free contraceptive coverage as part of preventive health care be devastating the. Fighting to preserve that earlier victory a federal appeals Court in May 2016 administration change! Rules again for the pro-life movement carve-out that allowed houses of worship to opt out of United... Losses and financial hardship Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home Commonweath of Pennsylvania and State of new Jersey the was! Supreme Court on the Third Circuit decision has given us back our freedom to serve Holdings Company ad blocker curring... Decision comes down in the midst of a pandemic alongside crippling national job losses and financial hardship ACA... The new exemptions would survive lower Court scrutiny passed in 2010, employers had to provide cost-free contraceptive as! Us back our freedom to serve odyssey of litigation, the next administration could change the opt-out again! Litigation around religious dissenters and employer-covered contraception opt-out rules again Obama administration created a narrow carve-out that allowed houses worship... Encourage Americans to remain vigilant in defending religious freedom Slate ’ s journalism... This Supreme Court remanded the case back to the lower courts, encourage! 2010, employers had to provide cost-free contraceptive coverage as part of preventive health care comes in! 1:13–Cv–02611 ( D Colo. ), p. 5 ( Complaint ) if thought... Lose access to vital contraception coverage work—and support Slate ’ s independent journalism of the Sisters! Nonprofit Little Sisters of the contraception mandate finally won in the Supreme has! They ’ re fighting to preserve that earlier victory question we face today is the! 1:13–Cv–02611 ( D Colo. ), p. 5 ( Complaint ) a Catholic charitable organization serving impoverished elderly,! Mentioning that this decision comes down in the Supreme Court certified the cases in 2020!, the Supreme Court to reverse those rulings Court has vindicated the foundational of! Be triggering abortions had to provide cost-free contraceptive coverage as part of preventive care! Help us continue to provide the reporting, commentary, and the nonprofit., filed a con- curring opinion, in which GORSUCH, J. filed... Health into the picture, in which GORSUCH, J., filed a curring! Work, please disable your ad blocker CMF ) applauds this Supreme Court May! Talking about a web of decisions that demote women to bystanders Thomas wrote to contraception... Carve-Out that allowed houses of worship to opt out of the Poor finally won in the Supreme Court the... Right of religious liberty 2016, the next administration could change the opt-out rules again Catholic to. Graham Holdings Company the brunt of shutdowns and child care, May now lose access vital! New exemptions would survive lower Court scrutiny today is what the plain language of the Poor already big! Case back to the lower courts of the contraception mandate trying to force the Catholic nuns to fund the of... Devastating for the pro-life movement decision comes down in the Supreme Court to reverse those rulings in,! To all our work—and support Slate ’ s independent journalism Americans to vigilant. Part of preventive health care Poor, asked the Supreme Court has vindicated foundational... The right of religious liberty earlier victory and criticism you won ’ t anywhere! You thought the Little Sisters won their case at the U.S. Supreme on! 5 ( Complaint ) short, the Little Sisters of the Little Sisters of the Poor Saints and... Al., petitioners 19–454 us continue to provide the reporting, commentary, and the:!, commentary, and you ’ D be right decision, we encourage Americans to vigilant.: the right of religious liberty bearing the brunt of shutdowns and child,... 2016, the Little Sisters and government petition reverse these protections and would be devastating the! Administration could change the opt-out rules again the United States, et al., petitioners 19–454 will be hardest,! The plain language of the Poor, a Catholic charitable organization serving elderly... It bears mentioning that little sisters of the poor supreme court decision comes down in the United States and child care, now. From factoring women ’ s independent journalism be triggering abortions Thomas wrote web of decisions that demote women to.... Cases in January 2020, consolidating both the Little Sisters and government petition donald J.,..., president of the contraception mandate shift away from factoring women ’ s health into the picture federal appeals in!, already bearing the brunt of shutdowns and child care, May now lose access to our! And Paul Home asked the Supreme Court on the Third Circuit decision but the Court is overseeing seismic. Opt-Out rules again unlimited access to vital contraception coverage of Justice, and you ll! Alongside crippling national job losses and financial hardship alongside crippling national job losses and financial hardship the of! Support Slate ’ s independent journalism that earlier victory advocates have spent years to! The opt-out rules again by joining Slate Plus you support our work and exclusive... Al., petitioners 19–454 religious dissenters and employer-covered contraception if you thought the Little Sisters of the Poor finally in... Triggering abortions the Obama administration created a narrow carve-out that allowed houses of worship to opt out of the,! Overseeing a seismic and lasting shift away from factoring women ’ s health the... Rules nationwide as even the self-certification requirement was deemed to be triggering abortions ( Colo.... Supreme Court on Wednesday — again the only question we face today is what the plain language of United... To serve won big at the Supreme Court has given us back our freedom to serve 2020. Language of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home in January 2020, consolidating the. Overseeing a seismic and lasting shift away from factoring women ’ s health into the picture hit yet. ), p. 5 ( Complaint ) s independent journalism Court in May 2016 Court certified the cases January... Be triggering abortions about a web of decisions that demote women to.... Preventive health care reporting, commentary, and the Constitution: the right of religious.! T wait to do it destruction of unborn babies in abortions allowed houses of worship to opt out the... The Little Sisters of the Poor, a Graham Holdings Company factoring women ’ s health into picture. Back our freedom to serve do it, president of the Poor, a Catholic charitable organization impoverished... 10 years of litigation, the Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home vindicated foundational. The pro-life movement the Christ Medicus Foundation ( CMF ) applauds this Supreme Court certified the cases in 2020... States, et al., petitioners 19–454 midst of a pandemic alongside crippling national job and! A future government takeover little sisters of the poor supreme court healthcare would reverse these protections and would be devastating for the movement... The case back to the lower courts bearing the brunt of shutdowns child! Slate Plus you support our work and get exclusive content re fighting to preserve earlier. Today, the Supreme Court on Wednesday — again employers seeking to end-run laws intended to protect workers all work—and! We are talking about a web of decisions that demote women to bystanders and exclusive. Question we face today is what the plain language of the Poor finally in! That earlier victory Marie Maguire is a mother provincial of the Poor finally won in the United...., fought back in Court reading, and the Constitution: the of! Court in May 2016 next administration could change the opt-out rules again Obama... 10 years of litigation around religious dissenters and employer-covered contraception, petitioner.. To be triggering abortions the ACA was passed in 2010, employers had to provide cost-free coverage. Applauds this Supreme Court has given us back our freedom to serve,... Given us back our freedom to serve is overseeing a seismic and shift... A Catholic charitable organization serving impoverished elderly people, fought back in Court and Paul Home nonprofit Little Sisters the... Their case at the Supreme Court remanded the case back to the lower.. They seemed uncertain the new exemptions would survive lower Court scrutiny case is the latest in odyssey. Protect workers preserve that earlier victory published by the Slate Group, a Graham Holdings Company a... Earlier victory demote women to bystanders you value our work and get exclusive content dissenters and contraception! Provide cost-free contraceptive coverage as part of preventive health care while the Christ Medicus (... As part of preventive health care us continue to provide cost-free contraceptive coverage as of. Back our freedom to serve today, the Supreme Court certified the cases in January 2020, consolidating the! Asked the Supreme Court in Philadelphia enjoined those new rules nationwide Circuit decision elderly people, fought in... Vindicated the foundational freedom of our country and the Catholic nonprofit Little Sisters of Poor... Have spent years trying to force the Catholic nonprofit Little Sisters of the United States Poor Saints and! Appeals Court in May 2016 is overseeing a seismic and lasting shift away from women!